The boost approach is a bit different and is supported by actual legal
advice. The license lives in a file and each source file contains a 3
line copyright note.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Ellery Newcomer <ellery-
[email protected]> wrote:
Don Clugston <dclugs...@...> writes:
I tried hard to get Tango to use the Boost license. More recently, I
tried to get the Boost license available as a standard option in the
Tango ddoc templates. They wouldn't even do that, and someone
modified
my "support Boost license" ticket into "support Apache 2.0 license"
!!!!
I concluded that there is little chance of healing the Tango-Phobos
rift, because there are people on the Tango side who do not want
unity.
Sadly, it only takes one to tango.
What's the consensus over here on the tango team's solution to the
binary
attribution clause? They say they're going to include the license as
a static
string somewhere in the source code to pull the bother off the user.
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
