HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is quite possibly the legal technicality of the year, though I believe it would satisfy the requirements as literally interpreted.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ellery Newcomer < [email protected]> wrote: > Don Clugston <dclugs...@...> writes: > > > > > I tried hard to get Tango to use the Boost license. More recently, I > > tried to get the Boost license available as a standard option in the > > Tango ddoc templates. They wouldn't even do that, and someone modified > > my "support Boost license" ticket into "support Apache 2.0 license" > > !!!! > > I concluded that there is little chance of healing the Tango-Phobos > > rift, because there are people on the Tango side who do not want > > unity. > > Sadly, it only takes one to tango. > > > > > What's the consensus over here on the tango team's solution to the binary > attribution clause? They say they're going to include the license as a > static > string somewhere in the source code to pull the bother off the user. > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
