It is a bug, if you could fix that would be great. There are many places
in which we don't use @property but we must.
Andrei
Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
I agree. But, length of some range objects in Phobos isn't a property.
Is this a bug? If so, I will commit.
On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:28:06 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
I think the length should be a property.
Andrei
Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
Hi list,
This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
I have one question about hasLength.
Current implementation from std.range:
-----
template hasLength(R)
{
enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
!isNarrowString!R;
}
-----
This implementation has following issues.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property.
We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as
@property?
If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
