Thanks for your advice.

changeset 1495 isn't bug fixing, so I listed the summery at the WHATSNEW section.


On Wed, 05 May 2010 08:17:11 +0900, Brad Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:

Don't forget to update the changelog, noting the issue number if there is
one.  They're located in the phobos project.

On Wed, 5 May 2010, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:

Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 07:06:56 +0900
From: Masahiro Nakagawa <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]>
To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [phobos] length implementation for Range

http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1495
Committed.


On Wed, 05 May 2010 06:32:46 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It is a bug, if you could fix that would be great. There are many places in
> which we don't use @property but we must.
>
> Andrei
>
> Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> > I agree. But, length of some range objects in Phobos isn't a property.
> > Is this a bug? If so, I will commit.
> >  On Wed, 05 May 2010 04:28:06 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think the length should be a property.
> > >
> > > Andrei
> > >
> > > Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
> > > > Hi list,
> > > > This post is my first post at Phobos ML :)
> > > > I have one question about hasLength.
> > > > Current implementation from std.range:
> > > > -----
> > > > template hasLength(R)
> > > > {
> > > >      enum bool hasLength = is(typeof(R.init.length) : ulong) &&
> > > >          !isNarrowString!R;
> > > > }
> > > > -----
> > > > This implementation has following issues.
> > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
> > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3508
> > > > But, hasLength returns true when length method is marked as @property. > > > > We should fix the above issue or length method should be marked as
> > > > @property?
> > > > If latter, some ranges in phobos are incomplete.

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to