I'm all for removal of static opCall, and possibly opCall altogether.
On 5/29/2010 9:50 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > I think static opCall is there only as a workaround during the days > where struct constructors were missing. It's a good idea to replace it > throughout. > > Andrei > > On 05/29/2010 11:40 PM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote: >> I noticed that some structs use static opCall for construction(lines, >> CodePoints, etc...). >> I think constructing struct should use this(). >> What are the merits of static opCall? >> I will rewrite if static opCall doesn't have merits. >> >> >> Masahiro >> _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
