OK, I will rewrite.
On Sun, 30 May 2010 14:22:17 +0900, Brad Roberts <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm all for removal of static opCall, and possibly opCall altogether.
On 5/29/2010 9:50 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think static opCall is there only as a workaround during the days
where struct constructors were missing. It's a good idea to replace it
throughout.
Andrei
On 05/29/2010 11:40 PM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
I noticed that some structs use static opCall for construction(lines,
CodePoints, etc...).
I think constructing struct should use this().
What are the merits of static opCall?
I will rewrite if static opCall doesn't have merits.
Masahiro
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
