Yup. I didn't do that because std.atomics wasn't listed in the phobos docs, so I didn't think it was supported. But if you'd prefer we do that, I'll take care of it.
On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > One way is to have std.atomic just do a public import of core.atomic, and > provide aliases. > > Brad Roberts wrote: >> I'm ok with it going away (on the assumption that the core version is >> complete enough (left open for debate), I haven't looked myself), but I'm >> also willing to bet that this change is going to break an interesting subset >> of the population of D2 users. >> >> I'd rather see a deprecation warning for a couple versions. Potentially >> publically importing core.atomic if that's a viable replacement during that >> timeframe. >> >> My 2 cents, >> Brad >> >> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, dsource.org wrote: >> >> >>> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:35:40 -0400 >>> From: dsource.org <[email protected]> >>> Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [phobos] phobos commit, revision 1579 >>> >>> phobos commit, revision 1579 >>> >>> >>> user: sean >>> >>> msg: >>> Removed std.atomics. It was never documented, so hopefully it can just >>> silently vanish. >>> >>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1579 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> phobos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
