Naw, just delete it.

Sean Kelly wrote:
Yup.  I didn't do that because std.atomics wasn't listed in the phobos docs, so 
I didn't think it was supported.  But if you'd prefer we do that, I'll take 
care of it.

On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Walter Bright wrote:

One way is to have std.atomic just do a public import of core.atomic, and 
provide aliases.

Brad Roberts wrote:
I'm ok with it going away (on the assumption that the core version is complete 
enough (left open for debate), I haven't looked myself), but I'm also willing 
to bet that this change is going to break an interesting subset of the 
population of D2 users.

I'd rather see a deprecation warning for a couple versions.  Potentially 
publically importing core.atomic if that's a viable replacement during that 
timeframe.

My 2 cents,
Brad

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, dsource.org wrote:

Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:35:40 -0400
From: dsource.org <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [phobos] phobos commit, revision 1579

phobos commit, revision 1579


user: sean

msg:
Removed std.atomics.  It was never documented, so hopefully it can just 
silently vanish.

http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1579

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos


_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos


_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to