----- Original Message ---- > From: Sean Kelly <[email protected]> > To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, July 30, 2010 10:46:38 AM > Subject: Re: [phobos] Calling abort() on unhandled exception > > That's the thing. With Leandro's proposed behavior, the stack isn't unwound >because the exception is effectively never caught. The runtime can still >print >the error message like it does now, it just works as if from a signal handler. > With stack trace? I'd much rather have a stack trace than a core file. A stack trace can easily be read, is easy to email/attach to a bug report, and does not require duplicating the entire environment to use. -Steve _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Steve Schveighoffer
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... David Simcha
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Michel Fortin
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort() on unhan... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort() on ... Steve Schveighoffer
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Sean Kelly
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Steve Schveighoffer
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Sean Kelly
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Steve Schveighoffer
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Steve Schveighoffer
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort()... Leandro Lucarella
- Re: [phobos] Calling abort() on unhandled exception Michel Fortin
