Steve Schveighoffer, el 30 de julio a las 03:44 me escribiste: > Wouldn't this be useless? That is, do you care about a core dump when the > stack > is unwound (and the source of the problem is gone from the stack)? > > If this is all you want, why not write your main that way? > > BTW, my opinion is that an uncaught exception should not dump core. It > should > print a stack trace and exit with non-zero exit code. I understand the > reasoning behind it, but dumping core is not a normal mode of operation for > most > users. They don't know what to do with a core file, and silently dumping > core > on a system where one is not expecting it can fill up a filesystem.
Come on! Read the whole mail. abort() != dumping a core. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Es mucho mas probable que el salchichón sea primavera a que la primavera sea salchichón. -- Peperino Pómoro _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
