As others have said, I'd like this to use ranges instead if possible, and I'd like the option to supply a destination range as well. The majority of work I do with this sort of thing encodes in-place into existing buffers.
On Oct 10, 2010, at 12:06 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote: > Current std.base64 is not Boost License. > > So, I wrote base64 module. > > http://bitbucket.org/repeatedly/scrap/src/tip/base64.d > > This module is based on RFC4648 and faster than std.base64. > In addition, User can encode / decode modified Base64 format using Base64Impl. > > What do you think? > > > Masahiro > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
