On 9/10/10 1:29 PM, David Simcha wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    The latter. Anyway, my vetoing abilities are largely overrated.

    Andrei


Yeah, it's just that I really want to make sure this lib isn't too
narrowly tailored to scientific computing cases, especially in easily
fixable ways.  I want at least the high level design reviewed by you and
Sean before I commit it, to make sure that it will be useful to people
besides me, Lars Kyllingstad and Rob Jacques (the three scientific
computing people involved with D, all of whom seem to like this
library).  I have yet to really have feedback from anyone anywhere about
it besides scientific computing people.

I believe that fork-join parallelism can be of much more general interest once packaged in an accessible format. So I'm interested in following David's work on std.parallelism through review and acceptance into Phobos.

Andrei
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to