That scheme would be fine. But I think it's easier and less redundant to allow phobos and druntime build their own documentation (under d-programming-language.org's coordination) instead of putting that code inside d-programming-language.org's makefile.

Andrei

On 01/30/2011 02:51 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
I'd like to suggest that phobos shouldn't be referencing 
../d-programming-language.org in it's DOCSRC variable.  I'd
prefer it if it was more standalone.  The d-p-l build should instead be pulling 
from subordinate packages (druntime,
phobos).

Thoughts?

Later,
Brad

On 1/29/2011 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I meant to send a brief message about this commit and the related one in 
d-programming-language.org. Let me actually
post to digitalmars.D.

I'll simplify the unnecessary branch with a future push.


Andrei

On 01/30/2011 01:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 [email protected] wrote:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home:   https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex<[email protected]>
Date:   2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)

Changed paths:
    M posix.mak

Log Message:
-----------
Updated website-related build

I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of
complaining about files which don't exist?

Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:

# Set DDOC, the documentation generator
ifeq ($(OS),linux)
      DDOC=dmd
else
      DDOC=dmd
endif

I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to be
used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly the 
same
thing in both branches of the if-else statement.

- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to