I didn't mean that phobos and druntime shouldn't build their docs.  They just 
shouldn't be depending on directories or
anything else outside their own tree.

On 1/30/2011 9:56 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> That scheme would be fine. But I think it's easier and less redundant to 
> allow phobos and druntime build their own
> documentation (under d-programming-language.org's coordination) instead of 
> putting that code inside
> d-programming-language.org's makefile.
> 
> Andrei
> 
> On 01/30/2011 02:51 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>> I'd like to suggest that phobos shouldn't be referencing 
>> ../d-programming-language.org in it's DOCSRC variable.  I'd
>> prefer it if it was more standalone.  The d-p-l build should instead be 
>> pulling from subordinate packages (druntime,
>> phobos).
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Later,
>> Brad
>>
>> On 1/29/2011 11:51 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I meant to send a brief message about this commit and the related one in 
>>> d-programming-language.org. Let me actually
>>> post to digitalmars.D.
>>>
>>> I'll simplify the unnecessary branch with a future push.
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> On 01/30/2011 01:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>> On Saturday 29 January 2011 23:09:14 [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>>>>> Home:   https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
>>>>>
>>>>> Commit: 0c6b3e9c3245888b72c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0c6b3e9c3245888b72
>>>>> c7d8b25e68e14c729c2af7 Author: andralex<[email protected]>
>>>>> Date:   2011-01-29 (Sat, 29 Jan 2011)
>>>>>
>>>>> Changed paths:
>>>>>     M posix.mak
>>>>>
>>>>> Log Message:
>>>>> -----------
>>>>> Updated website-related build
>>>>
>>>> I assume that this makes it so that the ddoc build works again instead of
>>>> complaining about files which don't exist?
>>>>
>>>> Also, glancing at the changes, this looks a bit off:
>>>>
>>>> # Set DDOC, the documentation generator
>>>> ifeq ($(OS),linux)
>>>>       DDOC=dmd
>>>> else
>>>>       DDOC=dmd
>>>> endif
>>>>
>>>> I assume that what we want is for dmd to be used normally and wine dmd to 
>>>> be
>>>> used with win32wine. Regardless, as it stands, the makefile does exactly 
>>>> the same
>>>> thing in both branches of the if-else statement.
>>>>
>>>> - Jonathan M Davis
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> phobos mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phobos mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to