On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:12:37 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
So add a rule for minimum number of days?
That's a nice simple idea, but it's a bit difficult to appreciate that a
change effected somewhere in late June immediately gets enacted in a
matter of days.
Andrei
On 5/25/11 2:59 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
What if the choice was made that July 4th and January 1st where the
days when 2->3 and 1->2 happens. This means we don't track when
something was added to what, we just have a predictable schedule.
Exceptions could be made for those that must be removed for updates to
be made, and maybe that can be on a compiler release basis.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis<[email protected]>
wrote:
The deprecation cycle has three phases:
1. Scheduled for deprecation
2. Deprecated
3. Removed
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
--
Simen
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
