Le 2011-05-25 à 18:52, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
> So, I'd suggest putting the date that the function will move to the next
> phase
> in the message instead of when it entered its current phase (or both dates),
> and we should try and adjust those dates just prior to a release so that they
> more or less coincide with actual releases. Then we can guarantee that the
> function will stay in that phase until at least that date (with the possible
> exception of moving it forward a week or so early if the date is right after
> a
> release). I can manage adjusting the dates and moving stuff from phase to
> phase if need be.
Or just don't give a full date:
"scheduled for deprecation in November 2011."
The month should be enough. There's about one release per month.
--
Michel Fortin
[email protected]
http://michelf.com/
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
