I'm alexrp on Trello. Regards, Alex
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/17/12 11:34 AM, Brad Roberts wrote: >> >> IMHO, we've got plenty of tools in our mix we just don't use them well. >> >> Bugzilla already has several dimensions of scheduling, including severity, >> priority, and milestones. Additionally, it's >> probably way overdue to apply more structure to the products/components. >> I know it's something Don has advocated before. >> >> Wiki is a good document collaboration tool. >> >> The DLang website is a good communication tool, as are the >> newsgroups/mailing lists. >> >> Between bugzilla for fine grained categorization of >> issues/enhancements/whatever and a page on the website to state high >> level goals, I'm not sure what else we really need. >> >> I absolutely agree that we need to have a better roadmap and to execute on >> it, just not that another tool is needed or >> useful. > > > I understand your concern (expanded in your other messages). Let's, however, > not derail the discussion into a false choice. Yes, we do have tools we > don't use. That doesn't mean we should stop looking at _other_ tools that > may be more adequate tools for our needs. > > So the proof that we don't use bugzilla votes or priorities does not prove > e.g. trello.com would not be useful. > > I think we have two good proposals. One is trello.com, the other is github's > new tools. The github chain does not seem very mature, but integration and > potential are definitely important. > > Could you guys make trello.com accounts so we find each other there? Let's > give it a whirl. > > > Thanks, > > Andrei > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
