-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:44:25 +0100, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
> So, are these conclusions correct? > * Customer is allowed to install RHEL on any number of machines > he wants, but this constitutes a breach of Service agreement and > results in paying a penalty if the customer is audited. > * Customer is allowed to redistribute RHEL without any "consequences". > * Customer is allowed to install and use RHEL without ever accepting > the Subscription Agreement, assuming he can get a copy. I agree with what Peter Bowen has answered. One thing to add: The GNU GPL does not include the permission to redistribute RHEL products or fragments when that would violate Red Hat's trademarks. So, the second conclusion above is partly wrong. Concerning the first conclusion, there is the exception of an unsupported copy of RHEL, e.g. where the customer did not renew his contract at the end of a year. In that case he could install the unsupported (unlicensed) copy on as many machines as he would like. Concerning the third conclusion, yes, I think that is entirely possible. Just think about someone who just wants to evaluate RHEL for some time before deciding whether to purchase it. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+gNxI0iMVcrivHFQRApX/AJ0ZtCS//CvXOXOYUPUbeVDa9NwvzwCbBeVB y5Wdk4fwMxjYJ4DFd6T4uOQ= =BQLE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
