On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 16:38, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > The complaining is that in essence Red Hat is dropping their > affordable line of Linux (the stuff everyone has been using up to 7.3) > and offering either the Enterprise versions (at in most cases > significantly higher cost) or what amounts to an experimental version > of Linux which is inappropriate for any sort of business or home use > due to its rapidly changing nature and lack of long term errata > support (the 8.0 and 9 line).
The premise behind this statement is that RHL: A) Has a rapidly changing nature. and B) Has a lack of long term errata support. These two premises are supporting his claim that RHL is "an experimental version of Linux which is inappropriate for any sort of business or home use". Start with A. How does the new RHL change in comparison to the old RHL? Does it indeed change faster? Next B. How does the errata support in the new RHL compare to that of the old RHL? Has the support indeed become shortened? Let's discuss the premises to this person's statement, and see if we can accept them as truth. If not, then we must reject his statement that RHL has become "experimental..." etc. -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
