On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 18:21, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:57:02PM -0800, Joseph Phillips wrote: > > Next B. How does the errata support in the new RHL compare to that of > > the old RHL? Has the support indeed become shortened? > > Yes. This was announced in December, not just now.
Prior to that EOL "clarification" (at least one year, longer for popular releases), what was Red Hat's publicly stated EOL policy, or were they making it up as they went along? > > -- > Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Michael Knepher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
