Edison stuck around a good long time, too, by pretty much the same method -- 
make a better product.  If the old man wasn't already deaf and hadn't abandoned 
records by the time the Depression hit...  well, I guess there's a lot of 
'what-if' over which one might speculate.Robert,
 
I read your post and your analogy is excellent, as is Edison's quality.  My 
1917 C-250 still has spring washers that still are like new, some of the new 
spring washers I have used were useless after one use.  It would be interesting 
to see this hobby 500 years from now.
 
If you read the book Out of the Shadow by Charles Edison it gives you a much 
better idea about Edison and the years after the depression.  When Charles was 
running the company during the recession Charles wanted to not downsize, Edison 
overruled him and as a result the company did not go bankrupt.  This book gave 
me a better idea of why Edison was so stubborn and I learned about the life of 
his son Charles.  Normally the book is available at amazon.com.  
 
I agree with your statement, all the what ifs and I wish Edison would have let 
go of the record part around 1920, but at least now I understand more.  Charles 
said Edison was such a great man that he cast an enormous shadow, and Charles 
hoped to get out of Edison's shadow enough to cast a small shadow of his own.
 
What makes Edison phonographs so interesting is all the varieties, he was 
constantly changing and improving things.  
 
The books that have made the largest impact on my collecting, The Victor Data 
Book, Frow DD book, Frow Edison Cylinder book, and Out of the Shadow because it 
covers a little know area.  Ron Dethlefson recommended it and it served to fill 
a void in my area of Edison knowledge.Best wishes to all,
 
Steve
 
 
From [email protected]  Thu Nov 23 09:01:34 2006
From: [email protected] (Robert Wright)
Date: Sun Dec 24 13:12:03 2006
Subject: [Phono-L] Edison company post 1929
References: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <001d01c70f21$0a56da30$95ecb...@dhzn6321>

Thanks Steve (and Ron) for the book suggestions!  I've come close to buying
a couple of those  and have a couple of them as well.  Time to fill some
more void!  I would love to see the state of the artifacts of this hobby in
500 years as well.  I have a feeling Victor-style machines will continue to
slowly dwindle while Edison machines'll just keep on running.

You mention all the Edison varieties, and how he was constantly improving
his products.  Indeed, he was wildly inventive (heh) in his innovations.  A
PC is a PC is a PC, just faster this year than last (and with a bigger drive
and monitor), but no real innovations.  Meanwhile, go into any Apple store
in your local mall and look at all the radical new designs of every kind in
which Mac's are now available.  There's that little 9x9x4" box without
keyboard, mouse, or monitor, for the utilitarians; there's the supercool
models where everything normally in a separate tower is now inside the
plasma monitor's case for the chic and space-conscious; and for a thousand
reasons, the iPod keeps getting awards as the coolest invention of the last
100 years, with all of which I heartily agree.  Similarly, Edison did indeed
continue shaking things up -- what was better was better, period.  I even
know people who collect and proudly display their old Apple IIe and IIc
computers (and older models as well).  You could even liken Apple's change
in OS design between 9.2 and X to Edison's eventual disc changeover -- OSX
runs in cells, like Windows, so that a problem with one program won't
shutdown all the others running -- but the similarities between OS's stop
there.  And then look at how much more software is available for PC than
Mac, Berliner than Edison.  So many parallels!

But if I ever get my hands on an all-original Orthophonic, ya better believe
it's gonna get a lot more play time than my Edisons.

sidenote:  Loran, that last post from you was one of the funniest things
I've read in a long time.  Bravo!  I am Thankful (aren't we supposed to make
a list of what we're thankful for today?) to be a part of Phono-L!


Best to all,
Robert


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Medved" <[email protected]>
To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 10:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Phono-L] Edison company post 1929


Edison stuck around a good long time, too, by pretty much the same method --
make a better product.  If the old man wasn't already deaf and hadn't
abandoned records by the time the Depression hit...  well, I guess there's a
lot of 'what-if' over which one might speculate.Robert,

I read your post and your analogy is excellent, as is Edison's quality.  My
1917 C-250 still has spring washers that still are like new, some of the new
spring washers I have used were useless after one use.  It would be
interesting to see this hobby 500 years from now.

If you read the book Out of the Shadow by Charles Edison it gives you a much
better idea about Edison and the years after the depression.  When Charles
was running the company during the recession Charles wanted to not downsize,
Edison overruled him and as a result the company did not go bankrupt.  This
book gave me a better idea of why Edison was so stubborn and I learned about
the life of his son Charles.  Normally the book is available at amazon.com.

I agree with your statement, all the what ifs and I wish Edison would have
let go of the record part around 1920, but at least now I understand more.
Charles said Edison was such a great man that he cast an enormous shadow,
and Charles hoped to get out of Edison's shadow enough to cast a small
shadow of his own.

What makes Edison phonographs so interesting is all the varieties, he was
constantly changing and improving things.

The books that have made the largest impact on my collecting, The Victor
Data Book, Frow DD book, Frow Edison Cylinder book, and Out of the Shadow
because it covers a little know area.  Ron Dethlefson recommended it and it
served to fill a void in my area of Edison knowledge.Best wishes to all,

Steve

 _______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
[email protected]

Phono-L Archive
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/

Support Phono-L
http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank

Reply via email to