Hi Steve, I'd like to see that one. I have a "thing" for Victor parts and would wonder why someone would use a smaller diaphragm seeing that the #4 (especially the brass bodies or good pot metal) is capable of slightly better performance than a #2. It's almost splitting hairs, but there are those of us who just have to hear the hairs being split.
Walt -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven Medved Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 12:18 PM To: phonolist; Phono-l Subject: [Phono-L] Mica reducing ring allows No 4 to hold No 2 Mica Hi, http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=007&item=170015155602 http://tinyurl.com/kctrb I have a gold Victrola No 4 reproducer that has what appears to be a ring that allows a No 2 mica to be held in a No 4 reproducer. Does anyone have any information on these? I will be happy to send a photo of mine, it appears to have been done a very long time ago. Steve _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list [email protected] Phono-L Archive http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ Support Phono-L http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.9/417 - Release Date: 8/11/2006
