nope, sorry, i guess i wasn't making myself clear.  i didn't call you  
any name - "snotty" was merely a description of your behavior towards  
the other guy.

but now that you mention it...

if i'd wanted to call you a name, i'd have said "pompous ass" after  
observing the seemingly-endless and usually-arrogant blather you  
produce, for so long.

"thanks for making my point, though"

On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:25 PM, Robert Wright wrote:

> lol, if you say so.  I wasn't the one who called anyone a  
> derogatory name
> like "snotty", however.  Thanks for making my point, though.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Fraser" <[email protected]>
> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Klingsor
>
>
>
>> uh, the pot calling the kettle black, or...?
>>
>> On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Robert Wright wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Exactly my point.
>>>
>>> r.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Peter Fraser" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:13 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Klingsor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> However, there's no need to be snotty, either.
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Phono-L mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Phono-L Archive
>> http://www.oldcrank.org/pipermail/phono-l/
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> Phono-L Archive
> http://www.oldcrank.org/pipermail/phono-l/
>

Reply via email to