Phono Folks: I agree with getting the vic II. It for the most part is smaller and if space is an issue, well... This strategy would allow for more room for more machines. My guess is that external horn models hold value better and to the general public, God forbid, have more liquidity.
Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan K" <[email protected]> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:05 PM Subject: Re: [Phono-L] My dilemma - which machine would you pick?? > the Victor II ! Always grab the horn machines, I say. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "john robles" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:47 AM > Subject: [Phono-L] My dilemma - which machine would you pick?? > > >>I am trying to decide between two machines, and I thought it would be fun >>to throw the question out there - >> Given a choice of a one-family, TOTALLY unrestored Victor II Humpback >> with an aftermarket horn with 12 petals lacquered red, green and gold and >> bearing a 4 digit serial number, OR a Victrola 130 (late model Victrola >> XVII with the little drawer for used needles) with beautiful gold >> hardware, nice original finish, either of which you could have for >> $1150-1250, which would you choose?? >> John Robles >> > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > [email protected] > > Phono-L Archive > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ > > Support Phono-L > http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank
