I don't consider either the Amberola III or the 1B to be common machines.? As to which is rarer, I wouldn't hazard a guess...
George Paul -----Original Message----- From: Jim Nichol <[email protected]> To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l at oldcrank.org> Sent: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 3:38 pm Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B The only question I'm aware of for the Amberola III is why there is apparently less interest in them than the Amberola I. Are they a lot more rare? Jim On Oct 26, 2008, at 2:24 PM, gpaul2000 at aol.com wrote: > > Peter, > > I certainly have nothing against Amberola IIIs! It's just that I've > been wanting to clear up some early 1909-1911 Amberola questions for > a long time, and I'm not getting any younger... > > Are there questions surrounding the Amberola III? > > Best, > George Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
