Hello George, Do you have any idea how many amberola 60 or 80's were made? I loved your home article and look forward to your new article. Steve
> To: phono-l at oldcrank.org> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:19:38 -0400> From: > gpaul2000 at aol.com> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B> > > > I don't consider either the Amberola III or the 1B to be common machines.? > As to which is rarer, I wouldn't hazard a guess...> > George Paul> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----> From: Jim Nichol <jnichol at fuse.net>> To: > Antique Phonograph List <phono-l at oldcrank.org>> Sent: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 > 3:38 pm> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B> > > > > > > > > > > > The only question I'm aware of for the Amberola III is why there is > > apparently less interest in them than the Amberola I. Are they a lot > more > rare?> > Jim> > On Oct 26, 2008, at 2:24 PM, gpaul2000 at aol.com wrote:> > > >> > Peter,> >> > I certainly have nothing against Amberola IIIs! It's just > that I've > > been wanting to clear up some early 1909-1911 Amberola > questions for > > a long time, and I'm not getting any younger...> >> > Are > there questions surrounding the Amberola III?> >> > Best,> > George Paul> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________> > Phono-L mailing > list> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org> > > _______________________________________________> Phono-L mailing list> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org> > > > > > > _______________________________________________> Phono-L mailing list> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
