Hi Rich, That was always my impression also until I noted that the Edisonic came out in March 1927 and the electrically recorded DD was released in October 1927. Then I noted the Edisonic was an improvement of the Dance that came out in March 1926. This made me believe that the improved reproducers and the improved records were separate improvements.
Steve > > That was always my impression. > > Steven Medved wrote: > > Was the Edisonic was made to play the electrically recorded records? > > > > If the Dance come out in March 1926 to compete with the Orthophonic and the > > Edisonic in March 1927 only acoustic records were made at this time. So > > even if you go with the studio recording date of July 5 1927 the Edisonic > > was out for at least three months before 52089 was recorded. > > > > It seems to me the Dance and Edisonic were ways to get more volume from the > > acoustic records, or am I mistaken? > > > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > > Phono-L mailing list > > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org From [email protected] Sat Mar 14 08:18:04 2009 From: [email protected] (Steven Medved) Date: Sat Mar 14 08:18:09 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Re: Nipper In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Hello Art, I believe the Chinese now own the trademark so it is not a Crap o Nipper but a sad monument to outsourcing and the loss of US manufacturing to China. Steve > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:37:43 -0400 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Phono-L] Re: Nipper > > Hi Group, > A very new looking Nipper has just appeared on eBay. Now, do you think the > Chinese are now going to flood the market with Crap-o-Nippers? It may not > look original, but unfortunately it looks pretty good. > Check out eBay # 220377222237 > ---Art Heller > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy > steps! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220439616x1201372437/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID > %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org From [email protected] Sat Mar 14 08:25:59 2009 From: [email protected] ([email protected]) Date: Sat Mar 14 08:26:15 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Phono Forum In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> The snide remarks and the confrontations have not occurred in years on phonolist. As a matter of fact the atmosphere has been rather pleasing. Paul, which I agree is still alive, has not made one comment on phonolist in years. Today I see no problems of this nature with phonolist. Rick -----Original Message----- From: Rich <[email protected]> To: Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:01 pm Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Phono Forum Well, one day there was a discussion on Phonolist about the difficulty of getting membership and I commented on the lunacy of the Flint policy. ?several snarky comments were made by people who had nothing constructive to add to any discussion. So I explained in detail that there was an alternative venue that was free of the toxic atmosphere and oppressive dictatorial rules and left. I had been a member of Phonolist since its inception and had grown quite tired of the attitudes, I will not be going back.? ? Steven Medved wrote:? > I understand how you feel, I was once the recipient of a huge amount of > rudeness that took about three years to heal so I understand. I still don't > participate like I did but I stayed on phonolist because Ron D was there and > now phonolist is a totally different list with Wayne in charge and Flint > basically retired.? > >> I was once a member of Flin't's phonolist, and was crowded off. But, > >> having? >> read all of this, no matter who is in charge of it, I just want to avoid it? >> like the plague. I'm on Dan Gilmore's and a few radio lists, and those seem? >> to be enough. LOL, the intrigue!? >>? >>? > > _______________________________________________? > Phono-L mailing list? > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org? > > _______________________________________________? Phono-L mailing list? http://phono-l.oldcrank.org?
