The outside edge of the Orthophonic diaphragm isn't supposed to move, so is clamped down between those thin paper gaskets. There's really no advantage in switching to something softer, as it'll be too thin to offer any cushioning AND will still be squashed down hard & flat by the reproducer shell. Preventing air leaks is the only real function of the Orthophonic gaskets. Brunswick used the same type of shellacked paper or cardboard in their acoustic "Panatrope" box.

I have a portable (made specifically for the Linguaphone language courses) which has a weird combo: an Ortho-like aluminum diaphragm AND hollow rubber gaskets, same as used with mica. The box is of the one-piece type, on which the second gasket is tucked-in around the rim ... replacing those was frustrating as Heck, because until the entire top gasket was in, the uneven pressure buckled the diaphragm horribly! The sound quality is good, but not any better than an Orthophonic.





----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Medved" <[email protected]>
To: "Phono-l" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Orthophonic Reproducer Gaskets question...



Hello Al,

The original looks like paper coated with shellac to me. I have spoken to people who rebuild them and they tell me you get better sound from neoprene. I would assume Ron Sitko is selling them.

Steve

From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:26:27 -0400
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Orthophonic Reproducer Gaskets question...

Does anyone on this learned list know what material was used as gaskets on
the Victor Orthophonic reproducer?  I have been asked to make a punch and
die to cut them out but if someone is already making them I don't intend on
reinventing the wheel.

_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to