I should buy your Charleston record. I have several, but I don't think I have
this version with Ben Selvin. Does it really sound a lot better than Whiteman
and the others? You probably don't have an audio file?
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:32:34 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] New phonograph - Pathe cylinder machine
>
> I have had one of those before, I love them. They were known as the Pathe No.
> 1, and in England were known as the New Perfecta. Does yours play both sizes
> of cylinder?
>
> --- On Mon, 1/17/11, Vinyl Visions <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Vinyl Visions <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] New phonograph - Pathe cylinder machine
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, January 17, 2011, 6:24 PM
>
>
> I love your machine, John. I have one that the works flip over into a chest
> which then looks like a small jewelry box with a brass handle on top.
>
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:18:55 -0800
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] New phonograph - Pathe cylinder machine
> >
> > It's not bad actually, equal or less than a Q. The box helps a lot.
> >
> > --- On Mon, 1/17/11, DanKj <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: DanKj <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] New phonograph - Pathe cylinder machine
> > To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]>
> > Date: Monday, January 17, 2011, 6:03 PM
> >
> > Very showy, with all that nickel. And the little box is a nice bonus. How
> > does the motor noise compare with a Q or a Gem ?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "john robles" <[email protected]>
> >
> > Hi all
> > Here is the newest machine I have acquired, purchased before Christmas. Had
> > I known the expenses I would run into with my dog, I might have waited...
> > It is a Pathe Coquet, a French machine from about 1905 or so. It is small,
> > the size of a Columbia AA, very cute. It is made of walnut, which is a nice
> > change from oak. The reproducer had been cobbled together with rubber
> > cement instead of proper gaskets, and the sapphire is broken. I have a new
> > sapphire and gaskets and diaphragm on order. I had to use GooGone and a
> > dental implement to clean the gunk off the reproducer; see the before/after
> > picture. Here is a link to the photos.
> > http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa39/john9ten/Pathe%20Coquet/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phono-L mailing list
> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phono-L mailing list
> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
