Mr. Mercer, please contact me "off list" to discuss my C-2s - you seem to
have expertise with Edison electronics.   My "E-mail" is:
[email protected]

Jim Cartwright
IMMORTAL PERFORMANCES, INC
"Austin’s Eclectic Used Record Store Since 1971"
1404 West 30th Street    Austin, Texas 78703-1402 USA
(512) 478-9954    E-mail: [email protected]


> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Mercer <[email protected]>
> To: Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]>
> Date: 17-Mar-2011 10:00:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] [phonolist] 5700 series Blue Amberols
>
> Jim,
> it doesn't sound like the pickup is the issue, although George Epple is
the 
> person to contact regarding these early types of "horseshoe pickups".
It's 
> possible that you have speaker issues that are fixable. The Peerless used
a 
> single wound voice coil as opposed to other speaker designs that used 
> thousands of turns of #20 gauge copper wire in the voice coil. The
speakers 
> must have absolutely clean and tightened contacts or the work poorly. I 
> rebuilt my R-1, R-2, C-1, and C-2 myself except for the pickup. These
were 
> the four radios or combinations that came out in 1928. Later models used
a 
> Magnovox speaker of more conventional design (green chassis). I like the 
> Peerless speaker because of the very high quality and the unique but can
be 
> troublesome design. The overall chassis builds (copper color) are
extremely 
> high quality with the Jr chassis in all but the C-1 which has the Sr 
> chassis. I'm curious to know which model radio you are using to play the 
> pickup through. Since it is an R-1 or R-2 and has the Peerless speaker, I 
> would unplug the radio speaker and plug into the C-2 speaker. Subbing out 
> the speakers will tell you right away if you are having speaker problems.
If 
> not, the problem lies in the chassis itself.  I'm going to contact you
off 
> list to find out more about why or how they do not play well.
>   Once everything IS up to par the set can be fine tuned to get rid of
other 
> sound issues by adding proper damping to the amp, speaker, arm, and 
> motorboard. Also, there is a "sweet spot" in positioning the speaker
front 
> to back to eliminate any boom. Properly restored, those C-2s should sound 
> awesome. I use the C-2 as much as I do the C-1 because it's easier to
load 
> unless I want the added power of the super amp and two speakers in the
C-1.
>
> Bruce
>
> (btw) the pickup should track at five ounces.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 2:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] [phonolist] 5700 series Blue Amberols
>
>
> > Right now my C-2 plays through an Edison radio using the same chassis &
> > loudspeaker as the C-2 & yes I had the restorer make the filter
switchable
> > & do not use it on Diamond Discs.    Both of my C-2s have been
"restored"
> > but do not play well.   Can you all recommend someone who really knows
how
> > to work on them?   (I have a 3rd, but the restorer kept its chassis
which
> > was incomplete & I've been uable to get him to return it.)    Through
the
> > Edison Radio using the C-2 turntable & pickup, Diamond Discs sound
great!
> >
> > Jim Cartwright
> > IMMORTAL PERFORMANCES, INC
> > "Austin's Eclectic Used Record Store Since 1971"
> > 1404 West 30th Street    Austin, Texas 78703-1402 USA
> > (512) 478-9954    E-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: Bruce Mercer <[email protected]>
> >> To: Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]>
> >> Date: 17-Mar-2011 2:05:11 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] [phonolist] 5700 series Blue Amberols
> >>
> >> Thanks for that information and the matrix number. Both my C-1 and C-2
> > have
> >> the same speed control knobs. It should be an easy thing to dial back
the
> >> speed indicator on the marked backplate for those late DD and Needle
Cuts
> > to
> >> obtain an accurate 78rpm. I notice in the factory manual that they
> >> recommended setting it at a comprimise of 79 rpm if primarily playing
DD.
> > I
> >> doubt the average consumer of the day couldn't tell the difference one
> > way
> >> or the other.
> >>  While on the subject of these machines, I'd like to know if anyone
else
> >> that has a C-1 or
> >> C-2 switches OUT the filter. It vastly overfilters the DD on either
> > machine.
> >> I rarely switch it IN.
> >> Bruce
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Philip Carli" <[email protected]>
> >> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:38 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] [phonolist] 5700 series Blue Amberols
> >>
> >>
> >> Possibly for new owners of the C-1 and C-2 Edison radio/phonographs,
> > which
> >> were capable of playing both lateral and vertical records by just
> > flipping
> >> the stylus?  -- one less step for new Edison owners to consider? --
> >>
> >> And how late are we talking on Diamond Discs being at 78?  The Goldman
> > Band
> >> discs in the 52630s play at pitch at 80?  I have 52650,a Frankie Marvin
> >> disc,  but I haven't played it in a long time -- might check it --
> >>
> >> Philip
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On
> > Behalf
> >> Of Bill Taney [[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:33 AM
> >> To: [email protected]; Phono-l
> >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] [phonolist] 5700 series Blue Amberols
> >>
> >> Why did they record the final diamond disc's at 78RPM? Seems rather odd
> >> decision since existing owners would have to adjust the speed of their
> >> machines for these records then adjust back for any of the previous 15
yr
> > +
> >> worth of records.
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >> From:  Steven Medved <[email protected]>
> >> Reply-To:  <[email protected]>
> >> Date:  Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:22:28 -0400
> >> To:  Phono-l <[email protected]>, phonolist 
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Subject:  [phonolist] 5700 series Blue Amberols
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello lucky owners,
> >>
> >> How do these sound?  Has anyone heard them played with the Diamond D? 
I
> >> recently rebuilt one with a new stylus, the diaphragm was still good.
> > Even
> >> without the extra weight it sounds better so I assume the final
Diamond C
> >> with the weight from the same casting as the Diamond D also sounds 
> >> better.
> >>
> >> I played an acoustic dub of an electrically recorded DD and there is a
> >> difference.
> >>
> >> Ron, the final DD records were recorded at 78 rpm so what was done when
> > they
> >> were dubbed to BA's?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> __._,_.___
> >>
> >>
> >>    Reply to sender
> >>
> >
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Re%3A%205700%20series%20Blue%20Amberols
> >> >  |   Reply to group
> >>
> >
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Re%3A%205700%20series%20Blue%20Amb
> >> erols>  |   Reply via web post
> >>
> >
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phonolist/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxdm9sOWhvBF9TAzk3M
> >>
> >
zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMjEzMTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYyMjgyBG1zZ0lkAzM3ODc2BHNlYwNmd
> >> HIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTMwMDI4MTc5Mg--?act=reply&messageNum=37876>  |
> > Start
> >> a New Topic
> >>
> >
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phonolist/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJldjZkZWxmBF9TAzk3M
> >>
> >
zU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMjEzMTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYyMjgyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc
> >> 3RpbWUDMTMwMDI4MTc5Mg-->
> >>  Messages in this topic
> >>
> >
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phonolist/message/37876;_ylc=X3oDMTM2NDRwYjNv
> >>
> >
BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyMjEzMTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYyMjgyBG1zZ0lkAzM3ODc2
> >> BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMwMDI4MTc5MgR0cGNJZAMzNzg3Ng-->  (1)
> >>
> >>  Recent Activity:
> >>
> >>  Visit Your Group
> >>
> >
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phonolist;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNGg5b21uBF9TAzk3MzU5Nz
> >>
> >
E0BGdycElkAzEyMjEzMTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYyMjgyBHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbW
> >> UDMTMwMDI4MTc5Mg-->
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkZHVkODIxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEyM
> >>
> >
jEzMTMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYyMjgyBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMzAwMjgxNzky>
> >> Switch to: Text-Only
> >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Change Delivery
> >> Format: Traditional> , Daily Digest
> >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Email Delivery:
Digest>
> > ?
> >> Unsubscribe
> >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>  ?
> > Terms
> >> of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> .
> >>
> >> __,_._,___
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Phono-L mailing list
> >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> >>
> >> This email message and any attachments may contain confidential
> > information.
> >> If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using
the
> >> information in any way, including but not limited to disclosure of,
> > copying,
> >> forwarding or acting in reliance on the contents. If you have received
> > this
> >> email by error, please immediately notify me by return email and delete
> > it
> >> from your email system. Thank you.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Phono-L mailing list
> >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Phono-L mailing list
> >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phono-L mailing list
> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to