To Loran, First, let me say that I have the highest respect for you and all that you have accomplished with Phono-L. I have faithfully read and learned much from Phono-L since I started in the hobby in 2000. I understand the need for proper identification of all posts on Phono-L to maintain the integrity of the newsgroup
I'm a little less happy about the maelstrom created by Steve Ramm when I posted an obituary notice for a dear friend, Charlie Martin, on Christmas Eve. In the midst of a very busy day, I posted the same announcement to several sites so that Charlie's friends would be aware of his passing. I believe Mr. Ramm knew Charlie and had been to his shop. I received many thanks from Charlie's friends and even compliments on the video of "The Place" on the other sites. I guess I owe Steve Ramm an apology. Apparently the rules meant more to him than the message. If I post again on Phono-L, I will be sure to use my full name. As the administrator, can we please put this topic to rest? Greg Caringi Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 25, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I've noted a bit of angst over having to sign our messages in Phono-L. This > came about because major email services (Yahoo, Microsoft, etc.) > implemented tighter measures to reject spam. Basically, if the sender's > email domain does not match the domain of the server sending the email, > they reject it. This resulted in a large number of Phono-L messages being > rejected. > > To get around this, I have to mask the sender's email address. Yes, it's a > bummer and inconvenient, but it's the only way to get the emails delivered > at this point. > > So please sign your emails as you would a physical letter. Thanks! > > Loran (Keeper of the List) > > P.S., Happy Holidays to you and yours! > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.org
