On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:29 AM, avdhesh .java <[email protected]> wrote: > As per my Understanding we will have same UI for all versions(google apps > engine , JCR).What differs is the underline implementations (filesystem > based for google engine and JCR based)..We already have seperate project for > the implementation part.. > > We already have photark-webapps version for photark UI. >
What I think we might need in the future is : photark-webapp - this would be a full blow photark application and would be suitable for deploying in a app server that does not impose restrictions... photark-appengine-webapp - this would have dependency on the filesystem impl and the photark ui, and the would have the necessary appengine configuration side files etc etc.... > we can Integrate maven-junction-plugin with the photark-embedded > pom.xml.Byusing link goal of this plugin we can have photark ui > resources avble for > the photark-embedded project.. > > http://pyx4j.com/pyx4j-maven-plugins/maven-junction-plugin/introduction.html > I was thinking on the assembly plugin, that would copy stuff from let's say a photark-ui and photark-ui-admin projects into the war... Thoughts ? Also, it wasn't clear if you said photark-embedded is needed or not :) -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
