On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:22 AM, avdhesh .java <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:29 AM, avdhesh .java <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > As per my Understanding we will have same UI for all versions(google apps >> > engine , JCR).What differs is the underline implementations (filesystem >> > based for google engine and JCR based)..We already have seperate project >> for >> > the implementation part.. >> > >> > We already have photark-webapps version for photark UI. >> > >> >> What I think we might need in the future is : >> >> photark-webapp >> - this would be a full blow photark application and would be >> suitable for deploying in a app server that does not impose >> restrictions... >> >> photark-appengine-webapp >> - this would have dependency on the filesystem impl and the photark >> ui, and the would have the necessary appengine configuration side >> files etc >> > > etc.... >> > > That means we have following projects. > > *photark* : Java Source > *photark-ui* : front end for the gallery and albums > *photark-admin-ui* : administation ui > *photark-webapp*: configuration side files for deployment on appserver e.g > tomcat , jetty etc > *photark-appengine-webapp*: configuration side files for deployment on the > google apps engine > > I agree with these project. >
I have implemented a a structure very similar to the one described above. The photark-ui is actually a war, that gets overlayed to one of the final photark application. Please take a look and provide any feedback -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
