On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Avdhesh Yadav <[email protected]> wrote: > As You guys know that PhotArk distributed as .zip and .tar files which > contains photark.war,licenses and notices files etc.Currently photark.war > contains photark related jars and third party jars but we do not include any > license and notices in the war.On legal-discuss mailing David Jencks pointed > that it is possible that someone try to put photark.war in publically > accessible maven repo and in that scenario it would be more clear to > consumer of photark.war if war contains license and notices files.I agree > with this and I think we should include license and notices files to > Photark. > > > To fix it I think we just need to put these two files(license and notices > files) in photark.war. > > Thoughts ? >
If we go this route, we should tweak the maven build to use one set of license and notice files for the binary and war files. Another approach is that we abandon the binary distribution, and release source, photark.war and photark-appengine.war. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
