Hi, Happy New Year to All !!
Do we need to tweak the maven build ? What I think is that we simply have to put LICENSE and NOTICES file in photark-webapp and photark-appengine-webapp modules and it will be automatically included in the war file. I think we can switch to distributing source, photark.war, photark-appengine.war and stop distributing zip and tars. thought ? On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Avdhesh Yadav <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As You guys know that PhotArk distributed as .zip and .tar files which > > contains photark.war,licenses and notices files etc.Currently photark.war > > contains photark related jars and third party jars but we do not include > any > > license and notices in the war.On legal-discuss mailing David Jencks > pointed > > that it is possible that someone try to put photark.war in publically > > accessible maven repo and in that scenario it would be more clear to > > consumer of photark.war if war contains license and notices files.I agree > > with this and I think we should include license and notices files to > > Photark. > > > > > > To fix it I think we just need to put these two files(license and notices > > files) in photark.war. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > If we go this route, we should tweak the maven build to use one set of > license and notice files for the binary and war files. > > Another approach is that we abandon the binary distribution, and > release source, photark.war and photark-appengine.war. > > Thoughts ? > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Avdhesh Yadav http://www.avdheshyadav.com http://twitter.com/yadavavdhesh
