Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61660&edit=1
ID: 61660
Comment by: theanomaly dot is at gmail dot com
Reported by: krtek4+php at gmail dot com
Summary: bin2hex(hex2bin($data)) != $data
Status: Open
Type: Bug
Package: *General Issues
Operating System: Debian Linux
PHP Version: 5.4.1RC1
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
We have no problem type juggling a string to an int as the first
non-whitespace,
non-zero number character...
var_dump(1 + "\t\r\n 0001"); // int(2)
Then, equally, we should have no problem interpreting a hexadecimal
representation of 1 as 01.
:)
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-04-08 16:05:02] ras...@php.net
> The reason is simple: A padding can be either added on the left or on the
right. E.g. "af52b" could be interpreted both as "0af52b" and as "af52b0".
Why would af52b ever mean af52b0 ? That's like saying 15 could be interpreted
as
150 sometimes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-04-08 15:25:52] ni...@php.net
In my eyes hex2bin should not try to fix the corrupt data by padding it with
zero. Instead it should throw a warning.
The reason is simple: A padding can be either added on the left or on the
right. E.g. "af52b" could be interpreted both as "0af52b" and as "af52b0".
Both are valid interpretations, depending on the use case.
Because of this I think a warning is more appropriate. It signals the user that
the data is wrong. He can always easily fix it by adding a zero to either of
the sides, whatever is more appropriate in his particular situation.
Blindly adding the padding on the other hand will probably be quite unexpected.
Especially when adding the 0 on the left side all the data will be shifted by 4
bits. This means that the whole data will be corrupted. All bytes will change.
(Adding a padding on the right is less intrusive as it only changes one byte).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-04-08 13:20:35] krtek4+php at gmail dot com
You are right, there was a bug in the patch I sent. I updated it on github.
Thanks for the comment !
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-04-08 12:23:32] theanomaly dot is at gmail dot com
@krtek4+php
I didn't mean to step on any toes, honestly. I think your patch probably looks
way cleaner than mine, but when I tried compiling your patch it did not work
for
me. The test didn't pass.
var_dump(bin2hex(hex2bin(1))); // returned string(0) ""
Maybe I didn't do it right, but that's the only reason I submitted another
patch
after I tested again on the PHP-5.4 branch.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-04-08 10:08:14] krtek4+php at gmail dot com
If I could intervene, my patch does exactly the same thing without adding a new
test for each iteration of the loop.
Mine has only one modulo (%) outside of the loop and the new test is executed
only
once at the first pass assuming the string is a correct hexadecimal value.
Like said in your last comment, the % operation can even be optimized with a '&
1'
if needed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61660
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61660&edit=1
