On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>
> > > Frequently? So you have examples of browsers that do not handle 2-digit
> > > cookie years correctly? We know for sure there are ones that don't handle
> > > 4-digit years correctly.
> >
> > Could you give examples of such browsers which do not fall
> > in the ancient, unused category?
>
> That's not really the point, is it?
Of course, otherwise I would have not listed them.
> We know they exist.
I only know of ancient, unused browsers. If you (plural)
know that other browsers exist which only handle 2-digit
years, then please share your knowledge.
> I was simply
> asking for an example of one of these "frequently" occurring problem
> browsers that warrant this change.
You missed that I used the future tense, didn't you?
There is little point in maintaining backwards compatibility
if it can be established that there is no need for it
anymore.
- Sascha
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
