On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Jon Parise wrote:

> So, once again, all I really want to know is what is so special about
> php.ini-dist?  And what _specific_ settings do you (Yasuo) feel must
> be applied to run-tests.php in order to run properly?  And why can't
> they just be specified via ini_set() calls.

I don't care about php.ini-dist, but I do think there is something
useful in knowing that our tests validate under
php.ini-recommended. If that's the configuration that we're putting
forth as "the way to do it," we should make sure everything runs
correctly with those settings.

> In short, I just want to know why run-tests.php needs an external
> dependency on php.ini-dist.  I would much prefer run-tests.php to be
> self-contained.

We could probably make sure run-tests.php had the same default
settings as php.ini-recommended (and overrode them when necessary to
test alternate configurations), but if we always use the actual
php.ini-recommended file from the distribution, we don't need to worry
about the two becoming out of sync.

I can see the niceness of having run-tests.php operate as a
standalone. For me, I guess it comes down to when we expect people to
be running the tests without us having access to php.ini-recommended
and if those instances are worth a possible mis-snyc with the file
itself.

-adam


-- 
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to