On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > Yes I do know what you were trying to explain, but I again do not agree > > with your reasoning. > > Ok, but it's not compelling since you are one of them > that didn't aware of the result of the change. > [snip unrelated issue] > > I can think of many good reasons that we are better to use > specific ini, but I don't see good enough reason not to. > > run-tests.php is supposed to used by many people. Therefore, > run-tests.php should be better if it's robust as possible. > > Why we need to ask troubles?
I tell you that I am aware of the issue that the tests suite may result in sometimes different results because of this, and that's supposed to be like that to be able to test as much different combinations as possible (like Ilia said in [2]). Although I agree with Jon's [1] post that some settings should be hardcoded used ini_set(). [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-cvs&m=103525648428370&w=2 [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-cvs&m=103533697806578&w=2 Now revert that change please, as your opinion is clearly shared by the least amount of people. Derick -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ JDI Media Solutions --------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]- -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
