On November 13, 2003 05:54 pm, you wrote: > Again, this is breaking our naming conventions. (yeah I know there's legacy > stuff). > How about time_nanosleeop()?
Heh, I can't ever seem to get the names right. That said, I think in this case it would be better to keep the function name as is. So, far when making a PHP functions, which are wrappers around a C functions, the C function names were retained. Consider existing sleep() functions, majority of string functions, etc... Ilia -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
