On November 14, 2003 06:19 am, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Yes, but that is concerning legacy functions when we were too dumb to do > the right thing.
I don't think the old method of function naming is necessarily bad. If anything it helps people who come from C/C++ environment since the functions they are already familiar are readily avaliable under the same name. For functions that are completely new, I wouldn't even bother to argue and just rename it. But in this case I think it would be counter intuitive to name the function by anything else other then it's C equivalent. This is especially apparent in this case since not a single time related function has a time_* prefix, making it very difficult to find this function in a manual search etc... Ilia -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
