> > > 1) fix the code, so that it works with 2.5.x correctly as well > > > 2) make 2.6.x a prerequisite > > > 3) disable xml_parser_create_ns for 2.5.x > > > 4) use broken code for 2.5.x and fixed code for 2.6.x > > > 5) revert to yesterdays situation (broken for all...)
> > I prefer 3. simply add some #id's and be done. If someone fixes it for 2.5 > > then solution 1) is pretty much nicer - but i doubt anybody has time for > > that. > > > > As far as I'm concerned 3 is not an option. We are not removing > namespace support from PHP5 when PHP4 supports it. Broken in cases no > one has reported is better than not supported at all. If libxml2.5 is > supported there needs to be some sort of solution for namespaces, 1,2,4 > and 5 are all fine by me; I prefer a combo of 1 and 4. It will never work correctly for option 1. Namespaces in SAX was a 2.6 thing (SAX2). I dont like option 4 as if something is going to be implemented it should work the same regardless of libxml version used (which is why I prefer 3 over 4 - feature only available for 2.6.x and up). It looks like the only thing everyone here can agree on then is make 2.6 required and pray we are not introducing new problems. I prefer not to do this, but it may be the only option that everyone can live with. How much time we looking at between RC1 and a final release? Rob -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
