> > It will never work correctly for option 1. Namespaces in SAX was a 2.6 thing > > (SAX2). > > Right, but namespaces just need to work as good as they did in PHP4, we > can't lose that compatibility. If it works better - bonus.
So what exactly is broken then in comparison to PHP4? From the size of the patch and everything that was replaced, I was assuming quite a bit. And looking at some of the functions added (start_element_ns, etc...) - those are all SAX2 things. Are these needed to get it all working correctly or were those just additional features? If that is the case, then I would definitely agree fixing it for 2.5 is the way to go and not implement the additional features - Arent we in a feature freeze anyways :) > I'm fine with requiring 2.6, although things could blow up. Right, that is what I am afraid of as well. As I mentioned I can live with it, but prefer not to do this. -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
