2009/7/12 Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com>: > 2009/7/12 Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de>: >> On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 14:16 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>> Would it not be easier to reverse the process? We can use rest data >>> and convert them to either docbook (do we have a rest > docbook >>> converter?) or html. >> >> If we create a new INSTALL file it should be short and mostly point to >> php.net/install in my opinion. I doubt such a lengthy file as it is now >> can really be used. > > Sorry, I was not clear. What I'm suggesting is to keep this file and > generate www.php.net/install using it, not the other way 'round.
I agree with Johannes. Having a lengthy INSTALL file which covers all possible platforms and weirdness is quite useless today. This info should be in the online docs, but the shipped INSTALL file should IMO only contain 20lines and then a link "for more info see php.net/install". -Hannes -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
