Ilia Alshanetsky ha scritto:
> I did a quick test, and I don't see a significant reduction is
> performance after the patch.

That's cool. Maybe I'll try to perform some more benchmarking later
today... However, given that the problem here is that the
cursor/prepared statement name is generated using a memory address, how
about we use a different mechanism that prevents reusing the same name,
i.e. an internal counter?

Matteo Beccati

PHP CVS Mailing List (
To unsubscribe, visit:

Reply via email to