Ilia Alshanetsky ha scritto: > I did a quick test, and I don't see a significant reduction is > performance after the patch.
That's cool. Maybe I'll try to perform some more benchmarking later today... However, given that the problem here is that the cursor/prepared statement name is generated using a memory address, how about we use a different mechanism that prevents reusing the same name, i.e. an internal counter? Cheers -- Matteo Beccati -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
