Internal counter could work, or we could try to use a better random #
On 2009-10-26, at 8:51 AM, Matteo Beccati wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky ha scritto:
I did a quick test, and I don't see a significant reduction is
performance after the patch.
That's cool. Maybe I'll try to perform some more benchmarking later
today... However, given that the problem here is that the
cursor/prepared statement name is generated using a memory address,
about we use a different mechanism that prevents reusing the same
i.e. an internal counter?
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php