On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:07:28AM +0200, Corne' Cornelius wrote: > The only disadvantage i've had of storing images in DB instead of > Filesystem, is that when you use a PHP script to output the image to a > client browser, MSIE doesn't always accept a suggested filename so it > might try and save it as "your-script.php?img=2".
Perhaps using the syntax 'your-script.php/imagename?otherparams' would solve that. It does for the few cell phones I have worked on serving images to. At least apache allows that syntax. > Other then that, keeping images in DB is a lot easier since you don't > have to keep your DB in sync with Filesystems ie. Deleted records in DB, > but images still exist. Certainly nice. Now if only postgres had a nice way to dump/backup BLOBs. :) Len Sorensen -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
