Thanks _very_ much for your attention to this detail -- I like your
At 12:04 PM 4/20/01 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, TomHenry wrote:
> > Adrei
> > I guess the underlaying thread was lost -- the whole issue is just that I
> > don't have control over compiling PHP in the first place. I needed a
> > solution that could be implemented w/o being the one compiling 0 I I
> > compiled then I wouldn't have the problem at all.
> > And - that's why I have requested that (since the WDDX is now native) that
> > it be _always_ be embedded (like XML is already) without needed the config
> > line switches.
> > Maybe you can help me understand why this is not a reasonable idea (I've
> > made this request before but never get a reply)?
> > Sincerely thanks and much appreciation for all your contributions to PHP,
>I don't have any objections to enabling WDDX by default, especially
>since it's always mentioned as one of the "cool" technologies when PHP
>is talked about. I will go ahead and make it enabled unless someone
>objects and gives me a good reason not to.
>We all have photographic memories, it's just
>that some of us don't have any film.
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]