How did you arrive to the conclusion that the current crypt() salts are not 

At 11:27 29/4/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:

>Well, what's the deal with this? Sascha?
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 15:05:08 +0200
>From: Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Crypt salts not random..
>At 06:17 AM 4/28/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> >One thing I had in my mind about these random numbers..
> >Why don't we use the seedMT() and randomMT() funcs everywhere
> >instead of the system provided ones? If I have understood
> >correctly these would give more random numbers and are even
> >faster than any of the system provided ones? Or have I missed
> >some important thing here? :)
>I really don't know this random stuff too well. It looks to me as if we
>could use the MT stuff but I'm not sure what the considerations are.
>Probably Sascha Schumann has a better idea. I also suggest php-dev :)
>PHP Development Mailing List <>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CTO &  co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd.

PHP Development Mailing List <>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to