I have the same opinion as you have, but it leads me to to
conclusion Jani made: start deprecating the function now, and
get rid of it in 4.1. This is my reasoning:
if mysql_db_query() gives warning now, and is removed altogether
in 4.1, the behavior you seem to pursue is achieved: a function
is there for the whole minor version lifespan, and is removed
right with the next major version.
But, of course, you might have meant you wanted mysql_db_query
to give warnings through the whole 4.1 period, and leave it
out with 4.2.
So, what did you mean exactly?
At 16:59 10.5. 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote the following:
>At 07:29 AM 5/10/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>On Thu, 10 May 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>>At 04:03 PM 5/9/2001 -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
>>>>On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:28:55PM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>>> > Remove. Actually..should that mysql_db_query() be deprecated too?
>>>> > Starting 4.0.6 with warning?
>>>>That sounds like a good move to me (provided it's just a warning
>>>>for now). It probably shouldn't be completely removed until 4.1.
>>>I'd save the warning for 4.1.
>>Really? And can you please give any reasons? And some reasoning
>>for all these other stupid things that are dragged along from version
>>to version and not started to be depreciated (with a warning..) ?
>Because a 0.0.1 version is a minor version and I don't think it is appropriate to
>change this kind of behavior in a minor version.
>There are things I would like to have changed too but I don't feel an x.x.1 version
>is the right time to do that.
>It's just my personal opinion. I respect yours too.
>>The crap about breaking someone's scripts is not any good
>>reason. If people don't bother to read NEWS files, it's their own
>>fault if their scripts break, IMNSHO. I'd like to see the 'break soon'
>>movement to get stronger among the core developers. As there really
>>are no alternatives for doing this. If you do it slowly, it will hurt
>>more than if it's done very quickly. Like pulling a tooth..
>>Bloating a language with dozens of 'backwards compatibility
>>aliases', with functions which are not supposed to be used anymore, etc.
>>is worse thing than maybe breaking someone's scripts. There
>>are a lot of people out there who are starting to use PHP at this very
>>moment. If these depreciated things are not removed soon, the removing of
>>them will bite more and more people when (if never?) it's done.
>>And saying here that the new users don't know about these..well, go
>>and read some of those PHP tutorials out there..many of them were written
>>before PHP 4 was even released. As also many books.
>>There are lot of code snippets to be downloaded out there which might
>>also contain these depreciated aliases/functions/language constructs.
>>p.s. Why it has to be always me who rants? Anyway, I will keep ranting
>>until something is really DONE..and not just talked about..even
>>if I start sounding like a broken record.
>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------end of quote------
And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
- Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]